« Know your data 34: the best defense is offense | Main | Ethical dilemmas poll: results post »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Dale Lehman

Can you provide more detail on the author that examined the 500 RCTs? I find it hard to believe that someone attempted to get the data from 500 different RCTs - when I try to get such data, each attempt is rather time consuming. Further, I find it hard to believe that they successfully got data from 150 of these RCTs. My success rate is much closer to 0% than to 30% - in fact, it is quite rare to get the data. So, I have doubts about this - and, more importantly, am especially interested in finding out more about this particular study.


DL: The researchers were interviewed for the Nature article (the link is above). This is the 500-study paper:

Carlisle, "False individual patient data and zombie randomized controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia" (link)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Get new posts by email:
Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR, Wired.

See my Youtube and Flickr.


  • only in Big Data
Numbers Rule Your World:
Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Junk Charts Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

Next Events

Jan: 10 NYPL Data Science Careers Talk, New York, NY

Past Events

Aug: 15 NYPL Analytics Resume Review Workshop, New York, NY

Apr: 2 Data Visualization Seminar, Pasadena, CA

Mar: 30 ASA DataFest, New York, NY

See more here

Principal Analytics Prep

Link to Principal Analytics Prep