« Forced consent because they can | Main | Real-world vaccine studies through the lens of vaccine trials »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Michael Droy

The question is not whether we are 80% safer or 95% safer.
The question is whether it was a big risk to start with, or that lockdowns and mask wearing were ever valid policies.

It wasn't, they weren't.
never mind the economy, closing health services for almost a year will shorten lives by many more years than Covid has.


MD: Asia, and even the UK, outcomes show otherwise.


I did read somewhere that the epidemic modelling showed that for infected vaccinated subjects transmission was definitely not zero, but less than for infected non-vaccinated subjects. I think this may be something that they will attempt to extract from the Israeli data, as one of Pfizers aims was to collect real-world data. This is going to be important as we move to a mainly vaccinated population, as it will determine the level of vaccination required to end the epidemic. As to it not being a big risk, the 3% of 30-50 year olds in Australia with COVID that spent time in intensive care would disagree.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Get new posts by email:
Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR, Wired.

See my Youtube and Flickr.


  • only in Big Data
Numbers Rule Your World:
Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Junk Charts Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

Next Events

Jan: 10 NYPL Data Science Careers Talk, New York, NY

Past Events

Aug: 15 NYPL Analytics Resume Review Workshop, New York, NY

Apr: 2 Data Visualization Seminar, Pasadena, CA

Mar: 30 ASA DataFest, New York, NY

See more here

Principal Analytics Prep

Link to Principal Analytics Prep