« False-positive science | Main | Deep-dive analysis goes off track: do women earn lower test scores because it's too cold? »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


I get the impression that their methodology is still the one that is used on similar problems today, probably because it is relatively simple to implement. It would be interesting to see if something like a Markov model, or even word pairs, would be better at predicting authorship. There must be a massive amount of work on sentence construction from artificial intelligence research, as it would help a lot in interpreting written work.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR, Wired.

See my Youtube and Flickr.


  • only in Big Data
Numbers Rule Your World:
Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Junk Charts Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

Next Events

Jan: 10 NYPL Data Science Careers Talk, New York, NY

Past Events

Aug: 15 NYPL Analytics Resume Review Workshop, New York, NY

Apr: 2 Data Visualization Seminar, Pasadena, CA

Mar: 30 ASA DataFest, New York, NY

See more here

Principal Analytics Prep

Link to Principal Analytics Prep