« Purdue's Math, Data Science and Industry Conference | Main | The tradeoff between privacy and convenience »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Facebook and Google would realise that their predictions are poor. All the matters is that they are definitely better than nothing at all and better than a purely random choice. After all, they present a huge number of these each days only need a small proportion of responses.

What may happen is that these companies will limit or exclude more ads that may be offensive. I expect that they, especially Facebook, already do that with anything sex related. Condom ads tied to keywords of boyfriend or girlfriend would cause a lot of community reaction.


Ken: No disagreement there. In fact, their business models provide incentives that put the interests of advertisers above users. Another fundamental issue at play is the fairness issue: optimizing the average does not lead to individually optimal outcomes. Given what we said, is there hope of change in the way data scientists approach predictions?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Get new posts by email:
Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR, Wired.

See my Youtube and Flickr.


  • only in Big Data
Numbers Rule Your World:
Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Junk Charts Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

Next Events

Jan: 10 NYPL Data Science Careers Talk, New York, NY

Past Events

Aug: 15 NYPL Analytics Resume Review Workshop, New York, NY

Apr: 2 Data Visualization Seminar, Pasadena, CA

Mar: 30 ASA DataFest, New York, NY

See more here

Principal Analytics Prep

Link to Principal Analytics Prep