« Purdue's Math, Data Science and Industry Conference | Main | The tradeoff between privacy and convenience »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Ken

Facebook and Google would realise that their predictions are poor. All the matters is that they are definitely better than nothing at all and better than a purely random choice. After all, they present a huge number of these each days only need a small proportion of responses.

What may happen is that these companies will limit or exclude more ads that may be offensive. I expect that they, especially Facebook, already do that with anything sex related. Condom ads tied to keywords of boyfriend or girlfriend would cause a lot of community reaction.

Kaiser

Ken: No disagreement there. In fact, their business models provide incentives that put the interests of advertisers above users. Another fundamental issue at play is the fairness issue: optimizing the average does not lead to individually optimal outcomes. Given what we said, is there hope of change in the way data scientists approach predictions?

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEW BOOTCAMP



Link to Principal Analytics Prep

See our curriculum, instructors. Apply.
Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR.

See my Youtube and Flickr.

Next Events

Jun: 5 NYPL Public Lecture on Analytics Careers, New York, NY

Past Events

Apr: 2 Data Visualization Seminar, Pasadena, CA

Mar: 30 ASA DataFest, New York, NY

See more here

Courses

Numbersense: Statistical Reasoning in Practice, Principal Analytics Prep

Applied Analytics Frameworks & Methods, Columbia

The Art of Data Visualization, NYU

Junk Charts Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

Search3

  • only in Big Data

Community