« A rare article about the AI revolution worth your time | Main | Overselling predictive models (Hint: future performance matters) »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


I agree with the overall conclusion but there are a few minor points that could be corrected:
① Watson doesn't play chess as far as I know.
② The last version of AlphaGo ("Zero") doesn't use any historic game logs. Starting from the rules and playing against itself it surpasses the previous version in just three days which is not general AI but still very impressive.


Tore: Thanks for the correction. Yes of course Watson is famous for the Jeopardy game. Point 2 is so new that I don't have an opinion yet. If it does not use any historic game logs, how would it learn human playing patterns? Also, I'm not sure about the applicability to other problems which cannot be reduced to a set of rules.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR, Wired.

See my Youtube and Flickr.
Numbers Rule Your World:
Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Amazon - Barnes&Noble


  • only in Big Data

Next Events

Jan: 10 NYPL Data Science Careers Talk, New York, NY

Past Events

Aug: 15 NYPL Analytics Resume Review Workshop, New York, NY

Apr: 2 Data Visualization Seminar, Pasadena, CA

Mar: 30 ASA DataFest, New York, NY

See more here


R Fundamentals, Principal Analytics Prep

Numbersense: Statistical Reasoning in Practice, Principal Analytics Prep

Applied Analytics Frameworks & Methods, Columbia

The Art of Data Visualization, NYU

Signed copies at McNally-Jackson, NYC

Excerpts: Numbersense Ch. 1, 7, 8. NRYW

Junk Charts Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee