« Artificial human intelligence | Main | Data bite back: a Harvard lesson »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


They obviously have data for their predictive modelling, and so the question is how realistic was it. The obvious problem was that people will try to drive safer in the first two weeks if their is a reward, so they must have offered some sort of reward for good driving in the first two weeks. It would be interesting to know whether they recorded after the two weeks to see how much peoples driving habits changed once there was no incentive. Provide that the change is linear then it doesn't matter.

Lastly it is possible that it is based more on whether people own a smart phone and where they drive, and it is just dressed up as for safer drivers as a marketing ploy.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Get new posts by email:
Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR, Wired.

See my Youtube and Flickr.


  • only in Big Data
Numbers Rule Your World:
Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Junk Charts Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

Next Events

Jan: 10 NYPL Data Science Careers Talk, New York, NY

Past Events

Aug: 15 NYPL Analytics Resume Review Workshop, New York, NY

Apr: 2 Data Visualization Seminar, Pasadena, CA

Mar: 30 ASA DataFest, New York, NY

See more here

Principal Analytics Prep

Link to Principal Analytics Prep