« Financial and statistical incentives to over-diagnose and over-treat | Main | How to face the mid-life crisis in A/B Testing »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


It is also very difficult to determine if a very small effect is not a very small bias, and this is a problem with some meta-analyses. An obvious solution is always to look at the size of the effect not just the p value.


When you have a mismeasured regressor, even a binary one, isn't the coefficient going to be attenuated (i.e., too low) rather than too high? Or do you have some sort of activity bias story in mind, where active users who buy a lot are exposed to more treatments?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR, Wired.

See my Youtube and Flickr.
Numbers Rule Your World:
Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Amazon - Barnes&Noble


  • only in Big Data

Next Events

Jan: 10 NYPL Data Science Careers Talk, New York, NY

Past Events

Aug: 15 NYPL Analytics Resume Review Workshop, New York, NY

Apr: 2 Data Visualization Seminar, Pasadena, CA

Mar: 30 ASA DataFest, New York, NY

See more here


R Fundamentals, Principal Analytics Prep

Numbersense: Statistical Reasoning in Practice, Principal Analytics Prep

Applied Analytics Frameworks & Methods, Columbia

The Art of Data Visualization, NYU

Signed copies at McNally-Jackson, NYC

Excerpts: Numbersense Ch. 1, 7, 8. NRYW

Junk Charts Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee