« How to read Big Data studies | Main | Two unsolved problems of Big Data studies: confirmation and controls »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

zbicyclist

Google, Facebook and others do thousands of A/B tests each year.

In addition, advertisers do them as well. Even universities with review boards are unlikely to review A/B tests of their university web advertising ("should we show smiling multiethnic students at a football game, or students diligently studying in the library?")

But it's easy to spend practically no time writing a column expressing outrage.

Ken

I've also been amazed by the response. It hasn't taken the internet to allow this sort of project to run. I know of academics who have been involved with credit card companies mail outs to convince people to use increase their credit card limits. These are a simple randomised trial. Just send different deals to different customers and watch the responses. I expect they do the same thing to increase usage.

I actually find Amazon's and others efforts to sell me a book very worthwhile, and I'm certain that they do A/B testing to attempt to get people to buy a book. If I search them I'm more likely to find something worthwhile than I would be at my university library which doesn't care at all whether I find a book.

Last word might be XKCD http://xkcd.com/1390/ as almost always.

ZBicyclist

Supporting my earlier point that media are unfairly targeting the Facebook study as a cheap way to fill airtime:

http://chronicle.com/blogs/ticker/33-ethicists-defend-facebooks-controversial-mood-study/82091?cid=wc&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en

Title:
33 Ethicists Defend Facebook’s Controversial Mood Study
by Andy Thomason

"A group of bioethicists wrote in a column published on Wednesday that Facebook’s controversial study of mood manipulation was not unethical, and harsh criticism of it risks putting a chill on future research. The article was written by six ethicists, joined by 27 others."

Andrew Gelman

Well put: "a huge effect for a tiny non-random segment of a large population can coexist with no effect for the entire population."

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEW BOOTCAMP



Link to Principal Analytics Prep

See our curriculum, instructors. Apply.
Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR.

See my Youtube and Flickr.

Next Events

Jun: 5 NYPL Public Lecture on Analytics Careers, New York, NY

Past Events

Apr: 2 Data Visualization Seminar, Pasadena, CA

Mar: 30 ASA DataFest, New York, NY

See more here

Courses

Numbersense: Statistical Reasoning in Practice, Principal Analytics Prep

Applied Analytics Frameworks & Methods, Columbia

The Art of Data Visualization, NYU

Junk Charts Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

Search3

  • only in Big Data

Community