« The Washington Post confuses readers about seasonal adjustments | Main | Neat reads 8 »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Erin Jonaitis

Interesting!
Can we really infer fraudulent intent here, though? I would expect errors in the customer's favor to be corrected more quickly than errors in the store's favor, even if everyone involved is honest, because nobody will get penalized or fired for making an error in the store's favor -- which probably makes them less attentive.

I also notice the New York Post article didn't say anything about the frequency of undercharging!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR, Wired.

See my Youtube and Flickr.
Numbers Rule Your World:
Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Numbersense:
Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Search3

  • only in Big Data

Next Events

Jan: 10 NYPL Data Science Careers Talk, New York, NY

Past Events

Aug: 15 NYPL Analytics Resume Review Workshop, New York, NY

Apr: 2 Data Visualization Seminar, Pasadena, CA

Mar: 30 ASA DataFest, New York, NY

See more here

Courses

R Fundamentals, Principal Analytics Prep

Numbersense: Statistical Reasoning in Practice, Principal Analytics Prep

Applied Analytics Frameworks & Methods, Columbia

The Art of Data Visualization, NYU

Signed copies at McNally-Jackson, NYC

Excerpts: Numbersense Ch. 1, 7, 8. NRYW

Junk Charts Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

Community