« Pills: victims of sloppy statistics? | Main | Census 101 will help you avoid statistical fallacies »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


I'm thinking of the mammogram example where the doctor could not push the "detect cancer" button without also pushing the "cause cancer" button. If you fumigate offices, you're exposing the occupants to toxic chemicals that could have long-term health effects. I think false positives DO have a cost outside of the exterminator fees.

That said, I haven't seen a single, numbers based report in the media about the extent of this bedbug issue, just a repetition of the word "pandemic." Can someone point me to an article, or is the entire thing more hype for a slow news cycle?


Daniel: They typically evacuate the office before they fumigate or do whatever they do so I think the toxins issue is minor. However, the "fear" issue is ever present. My friend is investigating every itch on the body and examining every speck at home since the situation began despite the exterminator's work.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Get new posts by email:
Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR, Wired.

See my Youtube and Flickr.


  • only in Big Data
Numbers Rule Your World:
Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Junk Charts Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

Next Events

Jan: 10 NYPL Data Science Careers Talk, New York, NY

Past Events

Aug: 15 NYPL Analytics Resume Review Workshop, New York, NY

Apr: 2 Data Visualization Seminar, Pasadena, CA

Mar: 30 ASA DataFest, New York, NY

See more here

Principal Analytics Prep

Link to Principal Analytics Prep