« A significant mystery | Main | Twitter's folly: signal to noise ratio »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Tom

Though I suspect the lie detector comment was tongue in cheek, I have to wonder if even accurate lie detectors would improve the detection of doping. Since lie detectors only detect changes in emotional state, they might increase the noise more than the signal.

Cyclocosm

Good article—I especially like the point about the media's overfocus on false positives.

Also, Bjarne Riis is Danish, not Dutch.

Kaiser

Cyclocosm: thanks. I fixed the nationality.

Tom: yes, that was mostly tongue in cheek. It refers to the point made in the book that the media circus surrounding a positive test result typically involves athlete vs testing lab but in fact, the defence offered by athletes usually acknowledge that the PEDs are in the samples - they merely offer reasons why the PEDs are there (the gel, the spiked drinks, the beer, etc.) so the only way to resolve that is a lie detector (!)

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEW BOOTCAMP



Link to Principal Analytics Prep

See our curriculum, instructors. Apply.
Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR.

See my Youtube and Flickr.

Next Events

Jun: 5 NYPL Public Lecture on Analytics Careers, New York, NY

Past Events

Apr: 2 Data Visualization Seminar, Pasadena, CA

Mar: 30 ASA DataFest, New York, NY

See more here

Courses

Numbersense: Statistical Reasoning in Practice, Principal Analytics Prep

Applied Analytics Frameworks & Methods, Columbia

The Art of Data Visualization, NYU

Junk Charts Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

Search3

  • only in Big Data

Community