• Welcome
  • Twitter
  • About
  • Book Blog
  • RSS
Junk Charts
Welcome Twitter About Book Blog RSS

Junk Charts Trifecta Checkup: The Definitive Guide

Trifecta_checkupThe Junk Charts Trifecta Checkup is a general framework for data visualization criticism. It captures how I like to organize the thinking behind my critique pieces.

The need for such a framework is clear. Opinion pieces on specific data graphics frequently come across as stream of conscience. Proclaiming a chart "mind-blowing" or "worst of the century" isn't worth much if the author cannot articulate why. The state of dataviz criticism has not progressed further than assembling a set of "rules of thumb".

In putting this framework together, I aimed to make it simple to use and broadly applicable. The Trifecta Checkup involves only three investigations: 

  • What is the QUESTION?
  • What does the DATA say?
  • What does the VISUAL say?

Ideally, the results of all three investigations are one and the same.

***

The Question occupies the top corner because any data visualization project needs a worthy cause. I'd like the Question to be well-posed, and interesting; the former focuses the search for appropriate data while the latter ensures an engaged audience.

The Data should be relevant to the Question being addressed. Relevance can often be augmented by reducing noise, removing errors or transformations.

The Visual elements should represent the Data in a clear, concise manner, addressing the Question directly. 

The tradition of Tufte is heavily focused on the Visual corner of the Trifecta, including its linkage to the Data corner. As will be discussed later, it is possible to select the right graph for the data but the project to fail because the data do not solve the posed question.

In using this framework, I often start at the top and loop counterclockwise.

***

The Trifecta Checkup framework establishes a taxonomy of dataviz critique. There are eight types of critiques: each is presented with an icon, and accompanied with an example from a prior post on Junk Charts. (If you find better examples, please send them to me.)

 

0. The trifecta

Jc_trifecta Everything is in sync, and the chart has no weaknesses.

 

 

 

Jkatz-comp-4Example: Josh Katz’s dialect maps (link) is a fine case of using a great design to reveal interesting spatial patterns in a set of good data that addresses an interesting question.

 

 

1. The singles

Jc_typeq1a. Type Q

Some charts use a good source of data effectively presented in a visual display. However, the effort fails because of a poorly defined objective, or an unengaging premise.

 

 

LiquorconsumptionExample: The global liquor consumption chart (link) does a great job with some UN data in a small-multiples presentation but it’s not clear why the question is interesting.

 

 

Jc_typed1b. Type D

Some designs emerge from well posed and interesting questions, and the graph is well executed. The problem here is the data, which fail to illuminate the question. Typically the data only tangentially concern the topic, or certain adjustments are wanting, or there is a quality concern.

 

Nytimes_cpi_components_price_fallExample: NYT’s CPI Component Price Drop chart (link) suffers from over-processed data but the chart is well-executed and the question being addressed is important and relevant.

 

 

 

 

 

Jc_typev1c. Type V

Despite having a good data source and an interesting, well-posed problem, the visual design hides or confuses the message. These charts have long provided fodder for Tufte, Wainer and the like.

 

 

Piomas_imageExample: Arctic Ice Death Spiral (link) concerns an existential problem, and as far as I know, the data are standard fare but the chart fails because of the spiral design.

 

 

 

2. Doubles

Jc_typeqd2a. Type QD

The graphical elements follow best practices, and present the data well. This effort is in vain, because of poor data quality, and an unclear objective.

 

Nyt_mirthtaxesExample: NYT’s Mirth and Taxes scatter plot (link) has commendable production values but this difficult problem is tough to nail down, and finding good data is hard.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jc_typeqv2b. Type QV

The data has been properly collected and processed. However, the question being addressed has not been clearly defined, and the graphical design fails to bring out the key features of the data.

 

 

Nyc_311callsExample: New York City 311 Calls by the hour (link) visualizes a good dataset but it’s hard to know what the motivating question is, the insights are mundane, and further confused by the use of the streamgraph.

 

Jc_typedv2c. Type DV

An interesting question has been posed. The data fail to convince, and the cause is not helped by poor execution of the graphical elements.

 

 

Superstar-musicExample: The chart about the unfulfilled promise of long-tail music sales (link) draws us in with a nice question but the data do not give a good answer, and the visual elements are poorly executed.

 

Jc_triple_qdv3. Triple (Type QDV)

These graphical disasters do not get anything right.

 

 

 

Wsj_citibikeExample: The Citibike chart by WSJ's Numbers Guy (link)

 

 

 

 ***

If you use the Trifecta Checkup framework, every critique you produce for a particular chart falls into one of these eight types. If I ever get an intern's help, I will classify all of the thousands of posts on Junk Charts, so we can figure out what are the most common problems with dataviz!

Please use the framework, and send me feedback.

 

Posted: May 26, 2014

Get new posts by email:
THE BOOK BLOG

Link to Kaiser Fung Book Blog
Graphics design by Amanda Lee

Search

  • only in Junk Charts

Recent Posts

  • On the interpretability of log-scaled charts
  • Logging a sleight of hand
  • The message left the visual
  • Swarmed by ants
  • Aligning the visual and the message
  • Anti-encoding
  • Coffee in different shapes and sizes: a test of self-sufficiency
  • The reckless practice of eyeballing trend lines
  • Making major things easy, revisited
  • Making major things easy, and minor things hard

Recent Comments

  • John on On the interpretability of log-scaled charts
  • Kaiser on On the interpretability of log-scaled charts
  • John on On the interpretability of log-scaled charts
  • Mike Liveright on On the interpretability of log-scaled charts
  • Art on Logging a sleight of hand
  • Arthur P Steinmetz on Logging a sleight of hand
  • Bretwood Higman on On the interpretability of log-scaled charts
  • Howie on The message left the visual
  • Jon Peltier on Swarmed by ants
  • Merle H. on Anti-encoding

Categories

  • Advertising
  • Aggregation
  • Animation
  • Area chart
  • Art
  • Axis
  • Background
  • Bar chart
  • Bar-density plot
  • Blogs
  • Bloomberg
  • Book blog
  • Books
  • Boxplot
  • Bubble chart
  • Bumps chart
  • Business
  • BusinessWeek
  • Cambridge
  • Clustering
  • CNN
  • Color
  • Comparability
  • Composition
  • Compound plots
  • Convention
  • Covid-19
  • Craft
  • Crime
  • Current affairs
  • Data
  • Data labels
  • Design
  • Donut chart
  • Dot plot
  • Economics
  • Economist
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Event
  • Film
  • Finance
  • Flow chart
  • Food
  • FT
  • Games
  • Gridlines
  • Heatmap
  • Hierarchy
  • Infographics
  • Interactive
  • Legend
  • Light entertainment
  • Line chart
  • Living
  • Map
  • Medicine
  • Music
  • NYT
  • NYU
  • Open call
  • Outlier
  • People
  • Personal
  • Pictogram
  • Pie chart
  • Pie-density plot
  • Politics
  • Press
  • Principal Analytics Prep
  • Profile chart
  • Randomness
  • Recognition
  • Religion
  • Scale
  • Scatter plot
  • Science
  • Selection
  • Simplicity
  • Small multiples
  • Software
  • Sorting
  • Specialty plots
  • Sports
  • Statistics
  • Sufficiency
  • Superimposed
  • Table
  • Tech Review
  • Television
  • Text
  • Time series
  • Tools
  • Travel
  • Trifecta checkup
  • United Kingdom
  • Variance
  • Washington Post
  • Web/Tech
  • Wikipedia
  • Wired
  • WSJ

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024

More...

Residues




  • Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

CONTACT KAISER

Link to Kaiser Fung Consulting Inquiry

Link to Kaiser Fung Data Science Coaching Inquiry
Link to Kaiser Fung books

Numbers Rule Your World:
Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Numbersense:
Amazon - Barnes&Noble

Kaiser Likes

  • Alberto Cairo
  • Andrew Gelman
  • Bill Cleveland
  • Edward Tufte
  • FT Data | Financial Times
  • Guardian (UK) Datablog
  • Nate Silver’s FiveThirtyEight
  • Nicholas Rapp
  • NY Times Graphics Team - twitter
  • Robert Kosara: eagereyes
  • SCMP Infographics
  • Wall Street Journal Graphics
  • Washington Post Graphics - twitter

Kaiser Also LIkes

  • Book Culture
  • Bookforum
  • Caffè Lavazza NYC
  • Harney & Sons Fine Teas Soho
  • Housing Works Bookstore
  • Jeremiah's Vanishing New York
  • Piccola Cucina
CLICK FOR MORE GRAPHICS BLOGS
  • Book Blog •
  • Twitter •
  • Data Science Bootcamp •
  • About •
  • Typepad
Top