This chart was submitted via Twitter (thanks John G.).
Perhaps the designer is inspired by this:
That's the Royal Ontario Museum, one of the beautiful landmarks in Toronto.
The chart addresses an interesting question - how much do home buyers over or under-estimate home value? That said, gathering data to answer this question is challenging. I won't delve into this issue in this post.
Let's ask where readers are looking for data on the chart. It appears that we should use the right edge of each triangle. While the left edge of the red triangle might be useful, the left edges of the other triangles definitely would not contain data.
Note that, like modern architecture, the designer is playing with edges. None of the four right edges is properly vertical - none of the lines cuts the horizontal axis at a right angle. So the data actually reside in the imaginary vertical lines from the apexes to the horizontal baseline.
Where is the horizontal baseline? It's not where it is drawn either. The last number in the series is a negative number and so the real baseline is in the middle of the plot area, where the 0% value is.
The following chart shows (left side) the misleading signals sent to readers and (right side) the proper way to consume the data.
The degree of distortion is quite extreme. Only the fourth value is somewhat accurate, albeit by accident.
The design does not merely perturb the chart; it causes a severe adverse reaction.
P.S. [9/19/2022] Added submitter name.