Reading this chart won't take as long as withdrawing troops from Afghanistan
May 06, 2021
Art sent me the following Economist chart, noting how hard it is to understand. I took a look, and agreed. It's an example of a visual representation that takes more time to comprehend than the underlying data.
The chart presents responses to 3 questions on a survey. For each question, the choices are Approve, Disapprove, and "Neither" (just picking a word since I haven't seen the actual survey question). The overall approval/disapproval rates are presented, and then broken into two subgroups (Democrats and Republicans).
The first hurdle is reading the scale. Because the section from 75% to 100% has been removed, we are left with labels 0, 25, 50, 75, which do not say percentages unless we've consumed the title and subtitle. The Economist style guide places the units of data in the subtitle instead of on
the axis itself.
Our attention is drawn to the thick lines, which represent the differences between approval and disapproval rates. These differences are signed: it matters whether the proportion approving is higher or lower than the proportion disapproving. This means the data are encoded in the order of the dots plus the length of the line segment between them.
The two bottom rows of the Afghanistan question demonstrates this mental challenge. Our brains have to process the following visual cues:
1) the two lines are about the same lengths
2) the Republican dots are shifted to the right by a little
3) the colors of the dots are flipped
What do they all mean?
A chart runs in trouble when you need a paragraph to explain how to read it.
It's sometimes alright to make complicated data visualization that illustrates complicated concepts. What justifies it is the payoff. I wrote about the concept of return on effort in data visualization here.
The payoff for this chart escaped me. Take the Democratic response to troop withdrawal. About 3/4 of Democrats approve while 15% disapprove. The thick line says 60% more Democrats approve than disapprove.
Here, I show the full axis, and add a 50% reference line
Small edits but they help visualize "half of", "three quarters of".
Next, I switch to the more conventional stacked bars.
This format reveals some of the hidden data on the chart - the proportion answering neither approve/disapprove, and neither yes/no.
On the stacked bars visual, the proportions are counted from both ends while in the dot plot above, the proportions are measured from the left end only.
Read all my posts about Economist charts here
Just like the “neither” was missing, so are the “independents”. I base this on the Overall-Yes in question 3 being less than Dems and the Reps. It is either that or there are deeper concerns with the data.
Posted by: TheWeakLearner | May 11, 2021 at 12:47 AM
WL: Good catch. I chose not to address that because we couldn't infer Independents from the given data. I even tried to fit some numbers but they don't seem to make sense to me.
Posted by: Kaiser | May 11, 2021 at 01:25 AM