The New York Times showed this chart (link):
My first read: oh my gosh, 40-50% of the unvaccinated Americans are living their normal lives - dining at restaurants, assembling with more than 10 people, going to religious gatherings.
After reading the text around this chart, I realize I have misinterpreted it.
The chart should be read by columns. Each column is a "pie chart". For example, the first column shows that half the restaurant diners are not vaccinated, a third are fully vaccinated, and the remainder are partially vaccinated. The other columns have roughly the same proportions.
The author says "The rates of vaccination among people doing these activities largely reflect the rates in the population." This line is perhaps more confusing than intended. What she's saying is that in the general population, half of us are unvaccinated, a third are fully unvaccinated, and the remainder are partially vaccinated.
Here's a picture:
What this chart is saying is that the people dining out is like a random sample from all Americans. So too the other groups depicted. What Americans are choosing to do is independent of their vaccination status.
Unvaccinated people are no less likely to be doing all these activities than the fully vaccinated. This raises the question: are half of the people not wearing masks outdoors unvaccinated?
Why did I read the chart wrongly in the first place? It has to do with expectations.
Most survey charts plot probabilities not proportions. I haphazardly grabbed the following Pew Research chart as an example:
From this chart, we learn that 30% of kids 9-11 years old uses TikTok compared to 11% of kids 5-8. The percentages down a column do not sum to 100%.