« Missing comments | Main | Looking above the waist, dataviz style »



It's not in the original data set, but indexing the governor's salary to the state mean could produce interesting results.


I don't know that I have any other thoughts about this data set (aside from a regular bar chart would be 1,000 times better than the map), because it seems like a pretty pointless data point for each governor without some kind of context.

I don't know what an appropriate indicator within a state to compare a governor's salary should be, but surely there is something that would make these numbers be more useful.


TTD: Standardizing the salary data doesn't really reveal much. Turns out that most are within 1SD and if I recall, at most one number is outside 2 SD.


I agree, that putting the data into comparison with something would make it more useful. e.g.
- population of the state (we should expect governors of bigger states to be paid more)
- state budget (is the governors salary roughly in line with what the state spends on other things)
- approval rating (who gets the most money for doing the worst job?)

And I think the original pairing with party is interesting too. But I wouldn't use the affiliation of the governor itself but the broader measure of how the state leans overall (e.g. average of last 6 statewide election results or something). So the question would be: Do Republican-leaning states pay their governors more or less than Democratic-leaning states?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR.

See my Youtube and Flickr.

Book Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter