« Light entertainment: impossible is nothing! | Main | When simple is too simple »



Even given that the sizing of the 2016 pie isn't proportionate, how could it be when the total amount is given as a range? That should make it impossible to show the proportion right, regardless. Color also plays a big role here - the emerging markets, the ones that are growing, are BRIGHT RED!, while the ones we're apparently supposed to ignore are more subdued colors.

Meic Goodyear

The radius if the 2016 pie is about double that of the 2006 pie. It's the area that's not, as it goes by the radius squared.


"The radius of the 2016 pie is at least three times larger than that of the 2006 pie"? You sure? By my measurement, it's slightly less that 2 times, which is correct, if you forget to assign totals to area instead of length.

The comments to this entry are closed.


Link to Principal Analytics Prep

See our curriculum, instructors. Apply.
Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR.

See my Youtube and Flickr.

Book Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter