« The Earth Institute needs a graphics advisor | Main | A matter of compactness »

Comments

Ken

I thought I was safe in Sydney, Australia living 30km from the sea and about 200m elevation, but I don't think I will survive a wave that is going over 1000km inland.

LarryC

Try http://ns.ibnlive.in.com/embeds/img/world-tsunami-threat-map-170311-1000.jpg for a larger map

Bretwood Higman

Entertaining detail: Lake Tahoe is actually vulnerable to tsunamis:
http://unofficialnetworks.com/tahoe-tsunami-26376/

(Note that in this news article they correctly define seiche, but get a little confused. The landslide-generated wave that happened thousands of years ago would generate a destructive tsunami. There'd likely be a seiche that resonated for a while after the tsunami, but it would be unlikely to be as destructive as the tsunami itself.)

Seems like the map in question could be greatly improved if cities vulnerable to tsunamis were identified by points with colors to indicate something about degree of risk, and if each point linked to a tsunami inundation map for that city.

The comments to this entry are closed.

BOOTCAMP SUMMER '19



Link to Principal Analytics Prep

See our curriculum, instructors. Apply.
Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR.

See my Youtube and Flickr.

Book Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read



Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter

Residues