Football madness
The meaning of pretty pictures and the case of 15 scales


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Fabulous! Looks like 328 is about 25% larger than 327! I did not know that.

Dan Goldstein

I think the link is suppose to be


First of all, congratulations on finding such an amazing stream of terrible charts as cautionary tales. This bar chart is inexcusable and the title of the post is perfect!

I am not sure I agree with your absolute admonition that "For bar charts, one must start at zero... no exceptions." I would agree that this is something that should only be done for a good reason, but I am not sure about never...

Would you never plot temperatures (or other interval scale variables) on a bar chart? How about on a line chart? Or would you always include the 0 Kelvin baseline?

What if you were comparing variables with a non-zero lower bound (say SAT scores across school districts or credit scores of mortgage applicants over time).

What about variables with fuzzy lower bounds - say IQ scores or cholesterol levels? Say you wanted to compare cholesterol levels across ethnic groups? Or test whether the IQ of military recruits went down as the military strained under the weight of two wars? What if you know that the military has an 85IQ point minimum requirement?


My graphic design friend was once tasked with a graphic that was to include a bar chart. He asked me to critique it, and the first thing I told him was "you need to use a proper scale for your bar chart". He didn't start the scale at some non-zero number - he just used arbitrary lengths for the bars. The order was correct, but he really didn't even make an effort to get the lengths right - because it honestly didn't occur to him that he should have.

This may not be too common, but it does happen.

The comments to this entry are closed.