« Light entertainment: a self-referencing chart | Main | Nothing is as simple as it seems »


steve byers

Am I missing something? Isn't the most eggregious aspect of this the equating of $72.5B to $$29B by making them equal halves of the pie?


The "$0.2B" in the upper right quadrant that you refer to is actually a "$6.2B".


J: But... assuming that data is encoded as areas in a pie chart, then the green strip is indeed $0.2B because $6.2B - $6.0B = $0.2B!


I don't think that's how the chart is meant to be read. The $6.2B and $6.0B chunks represent direct spending and tax breaks, respectively, spent on Traditional Renewables, adding up to the $12.2B you see in the top right quadrant.

All of this being said, I completely agree that this chart is designed in pretty much the worst way possible.


Oops, had it backwards, the $6.2B is tax breaks and $6.0B is direct spending.


Wow. Plain pie charts are bad, but this goes waaaay beyond that. Data visualization should make information accessible, not misrepresent and confuse. +1 for worst graph of the year.


First time I saw that big tax in a pie chart.

Milo Schield

This is the worst graph I've seen in 2011. But using a line graph in your suggested profiles chart seems inappropriate. Using separated bars would indicate that the four categories are separate whereas the connecting lines imply there are some things/values in between.


what is the source of this chart?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR.

See my Youtube and Flickr.

Book Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter