« Light entertainment: sign language | Main | Worst statistical graphic nominated »

Comments

ivan

I'm glad you are analyzing my graphic so closely! Some clarification: It is sheer coincidence that those numbers add up to anything close to 100%. Each chart is actually baed on every infographic, so each chart is out of 100%. Because one single infographic can have multiple charts. Does that make sense? :) -ivan

Kaiser

Ivan: I should put "errors" in quotes. I'm interpreting your chart as a soft parody on the state of infographics.

I get how you are counting the types of charts, and why it won't add to 100%. Glad it gave me an excuse to rant about the common practice of showing "rounding errors" (even if it doesn't apply to you.)

ivan

gotcha! cool! :)

noleggio proiettori Milano

Nice information! I would say I am impressed with the research you made to make this article awesome and hope to read more about this. Thanks for sharing.

Kathryn McDwell

Haha! Nice - an infographic about an infographic. But of course, every single one of these graphics really takes a lot of effort. It's more than just designing with the right colors and font styles. Researching for information is all important. Anyway, what you did here is a cool design!

Jim DeRosa

Rounding is overrated anyway. But it does make sense for accuracy purposes.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR.

See my Youtube and Flickr.

Book Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read



Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter

Residues