« Making charts beautiful without adding unneeded bits | Main | Rightsizing: the graph edition »

Comments

Parker S.

Thanks for taking this on, Kaiser. You at least made it easier to analyze. It's still a lot of teams. I think one more revision to this might be to split this out into the three groups you mentioned - top quartile, bottom quartile and middle. I'd do it based on the ending or current date though.

The storylines become:
- Top 25% This is how the top teams got here (they've always been good, they were darkhorses [Tampa Bay] or they are rags to riches [Oakland])
- Bottom 25% Here's the bottom of the barrel (too bad for Detroit and Buffalo, Carolina is getting even more awful, and Dallas has fallen on hard times . . . so far)
- Mid 50% Steady-Eddies (these teams just don't have what it takes to make the next step up but they aren't dreadful either)

Anyway - great work. It's a little messy, but you did a great job with it.

Oh yea . . . Go Falcons!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR.

See my Youtube and Flickr.

Book Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read



Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter

Residues