« Community outreach: pie-making | Main | A second lease on life »

Comments

jeff weir

It would have been good if they had a second graph that normalised this data...then we could easily compare the trends.

James Pearce

Yes the initial data labels could even replace the current y-labels altogether. Might be aesthetically stronger.

I find the series labels are odd:

"White male" and "Black female" labels are closer to the "Black male" line than their own, and the "Black female" pointer seems to land at a point between two possible lines - why choose to do that at a part of the graph where two lines are so close?

I wonder if there is any way we could have graphically learned about the relative populations of these demographics. For instance, I note that the decade-long "black male" trough had no obvious impact on the overall average (or indeed correlation with the other 3 lines).

*That* appears to be the most interesting story in here: what happened for black males after 1984 that suddenly changed in 1997?

Barbara Alexandre

Very fascinating topic been a Black female myself I very interesting in finding more about the subject

The comments to this entry are closed.

BOOTCAMP SUMMER '19



Link to Principal Analytics Prep

See our curriculum, instructors. Apply.
Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR.

See my Youtube and Flickr.

Book Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read



Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter

Residues