[I'm back from vacation. Will provide my reaction to the responses to the Gelman challenge, and for those who have sent me email, I will work through them soon.]
The NYT commented on a trend among marketers to shift their advertising spending from so-called "measured" media like print and TV to so-called "unmeasured" media like product placements, contests, etc. The following chart accompanied the article:
This construct is akin to a population pyramid; it's great for comparing two groups along one metric, say age groups between males and females. Here, the two halves aren't comparable groups but two different metrics. The main metric, that is, the proportion of unmeasured, is not directly depicted: the reader must figure out mentally how much of each bar the black part covers. Also, the companies are sorted by unmeasured media spending but this leaves the measured spending with a jagged profile, confusing matters.
As for the little white slits on the gray bars, they are admittedly cute but it is difficult to compare the detailed breakdown between print, TV and other media among companies.
The following dot plot gives the two halves equal weight. (Pink dots are measured, blue unmeasured.) It's not a very interesting graphic though. The sense of proportion is still missing.
I settled on a scatter plot which relates the proportion spent on unmeasured to the total amount of spending. It appears that the largest advertisers had the lowest proportional unmeasured spend while the smallest (among the majors) had the highest. (It's only a weak correlation: a linear fit yields only 16% R-squared.)
Source: "The New Advertising Outlet: Your Life", New York Times, Oct 14, 2007.