« The sum and the parts | Main | Bubbles of death »



Too bad he's not graphing for us color-challenged folks--those blues and purples have terrible color separation, and it's not like all that's on offer is blue pixels. I know it would be confusing to use RED for a Democrat these days, but how about green, or orange, or brown, or....pink?

Jon Peltier

I guess the original mirror plot is just showing that for every winner, there's a loser.


I think the mirror plot shows that the editors were more wed to their turn of phrase--"Separation of the Ways"--than they were a sensible display of the data.


I do have to admit it was quite a clever phrase :)

Charles Franklin

Point on color separation taken. I'm looking into colors that separate but are also subtle, rather than glaring primary colors. This one missed the mark.

If anyone would like to give me some critical commentary on the graphs at PoliticalArithmetik, I'd like to hear it. I appreciate the positive comments here, but I would benefit from some serious criticism of the design as well as color choice. Aspect ratios? Better ways to put lots of information in a crowded graph? What do you think of the triangular plots I've been doing recently? Graphical critiques would be very welcome. Email me at charles@politicalarithmetik.com



Jeremy Kandah

I think that a line chart w/ the opposite information on the other side would have been more useful. The area at the vertical instance would show the % of the population dominated.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Kaiser Fung. Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker.
Visit my website. Follow my Twitter. See my articles at Daily Beast, 538, HBR.

See my Youtube and Flickr.

Book Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter