Where bubbles lead
Dec 15, 2005
This chart reminds us, yet again, of the issue with bubble charts. I have deliberately blocked out some of the data. If I blocked everything out, there is no reference point to estimate the size of any bubble. Even with the unblocked data, it is not easy to estimate the blocked data.
Take a guess before you click to reveal the answer.
Reference: New York Times Magazine, Dec 11, 2005.
my guesses were:
45(+3) 49(=) 6
29 58(+1) 13(=)
24 56(+4) 20(+2)
21(-1) 48(+1) 31
so i was not that bad. that's because i guessed that each line should add up to 100.
if you look at the "only some"-row at first glance every violet bulp looks the same although the second is 10 points bigger than the last.
but bulps are great: with bulps there's no need showing confidence intervals because you just don't realize tiny differences!!
Posted by: 失踪 | Jul 13, 2006 at 10:10 AM