« Visible and invisible errors, and the nefarious power of suggestion | Main | 2017 Review and 2018 Outlook on Cybersecurity »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Antonio Rinaldi

I think that fact checking (or more precisely, the kind of fact checking that is the current trend today) is overestimated, for several reasons:
1) it ends up to give fake news an importance that they don't deserve, while it should be better to ignore them and focus our attention on otther topics (https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-great-attention-heist/)
2) fake news shouldn't need fact checking because their falseness is self evident, while bullshit can be fought without resort to technical arguments (http://callingbullshit.org/case_studies/case_study_ml_sexual_orientation.html), but appealing to logical reasoning;
3) it states the equivalence (at least in the articles I've read) facts=numbers, as if todays there isn't so much abundance of numbers that almost everyone could choose the ones that agree with his point of view.
That's why I think that your work is unvaluable, because you investigate beyond the numbers; you don't simply evoke facts, but you are aimed at revealing the scenario that explains the observed facts. This is the real plus that I don't see in fact checking.

Kaiser

AR: #1 Yes, I use "fact checking" loosely and don't mean literally checking facts because I believe there are few objective "facts". #2 Falseness is not self evident, otherwise people won't believe and spread those stories. Falseness is self evident to those who disbelieve the news, and not so to those who want to believe it. This is part of the challenge of dealing wiht fake news. #3 Like you, I think simple logic is sometimes more powerful than math to fight nonsense. Numbers may help but anyone who comes to this blog knows that numbers are not objective.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

NEW BOOTCAMP



Link to Principal Analytics Prep

See our curriculum, instructors. Apply.
Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Founder of Principal Analytics Prep, MS Applied Analytics at Columbia. See my full bio.

Next Events

July: 24 Data Analytics Resume Workshop, NYC

July: 30 Joint Statistical Meetings, Vancouver

Aug: 28 Swiss Statistics Meeting, Zurich

Sep: 6 Data Visualization Seminar, San Diego, CA

Sep: 12 NYPL Analytics Careers Talk, NYC

Past Events

See here

Future Courses (New York)

Summer: Statistical Reasoning & Numbersense, Principal Analytics Prep (4 weeks)

Summer: Applied Analytics Frameworks & Methods, Columbia (6 weeks)

Junk Charts Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

Search3

  • only in Big Data

Community