« Binge Reading Gelman | Main | The Facebook experiment controversy »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

jonathan

When I read AG's original, I found the study report and I believe it was only a poster summary. I think those are meant more to tweak interest than to be definitive. My point is that this was a clearly limited effort and that the real problems, the real misleadings are in big studies with lots of charts and data appendices that hide what's really going on, what was left out, etc. These make the story telling much harder to unravel and they are more likely, I think, to become part of the continuing narrative.

junkcharts

jonathan: if you click to one of my two earlier posts on this topic, I have a link to the published paper. One of Gelman's readers found the paper while Andrew found the poster presentation. I'm glad we have both because the published paper only contains relative numbers-you can't find any absolute counts and so you can't judge what's in there.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Marketing and advertising analytics expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.

Next Events

Aug: 20 DataViz New York Meetup

Aug: 26 Optimizely Experience, Invited Expert, New York

Past Events

See here

Junk Charts Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

Search3

  • only in Big Data

Community