« Timid testers: evidence from a suppressed study | Main | Numbersense Pros: Interview with Andrew Gelman »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Ken

Unfortunately it is pretty much impossible to catch someone who is using a synthetic form of something natural and has access to a laboratory. Take someone who is a good sprinter but has 2% less than the average in something that varies by plus or minus 5% in the population. They will just slowly raise the level artificially until they are 3-4% above the average. Maybe what we should do is make it the rule that you can dope as much as you like, but you must stay below certain levels.

Kaiser

If you set that threshold, then optimization theory will predict that everyone will now dope at that level. So it's a hard problem to solve.

In the book, I use the term "chemical positive" to describe positive findings assuming perfect testing conditions but like you pointed out, there are lots of reasons why a chemical positive is blocked.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Marketing and advertising analytics expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.

Next Events

Aug: 20 DataViz New York Meetup

Aug: 26 Optimizely Experience, Invited Expert, New York

Past Events

See here

Junk Charts Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

Search3

  • only in Big Data

Community