« The hysteria machine | Main | Does being underrated have statistical meaning? (I don't have an answer.) »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Rick Wicklin

"What a surprise - the number of 'Likes' is insufficient to answer any of these questions."

Indeed. I think this is key. Society is getting lazy by measuring "popularity" by using easily available social media statistics such as the number of 'likes,' the number of followers on Twitter, or the number of hits for a Google search term. But statistics need to be evaluated for bias, variance, and those "lies and damned lies" that they potentially contain.

I've written a blog post on why it's a bad idea to estimate popularity based on the number of hits in a Google search:

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Marketing and advertising analytics expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.

Next Events

Aug: 20 DataViz New York Meetup

Aug: 26 Optimizely Experience, Invited Expert, New York

Past Events

See here

Junk Charts Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee


  • only in Big Data