« Not taking numbers at face value, even if they come from Google | Main | Prestigious college desperately plays down shameful manipulation of statistics »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


I think John S is on the right track.

Think of a "critically acclaimed" movie: a highly visible set of reviewers say it's great, but the vast majority think it's overrated. Or think of the restaurant that's just starting out in a nondescript strip mall: those who bother to stop in love it, but the vast majority of people simply have a bad impression when they drive by based on the wrong things (location) rather than what a restaurant would generally be rated on (food, service, atmosphere).

So you could look for restaurants that have a fanatical following, but flags of poor location, etc, that would cause many people to unfairly downrate it. Or look for restaurants which are highly rated by highly visible/influential people who are not representative of the general customer base.

If you're talking under/over-rated to a particular subgroup and you're a member of that subgroup speaking to that subgroup -- say a blogger -- you'd simply find places that were highly rated by your subgroup, but not by the general population. The consensus of being underrated is not a general consensus, but would be with "everybody" you know. Like the Yogism, "No one goes there anymore, it's too crowded."

Jonathan Baron

Perhaps Prelec's "Bayesian truth serum" would be useful here. It gives greater weight to opinions that are "surprisingly common" given the predictions of others' opinions. I'm sure it would show something, but I'm not sure that this would correspond to being "underrated".

Nick F.

If we define underrated as "not rated (often) enough" as opposed to "not rated highly enough." I think we get at a truer statistical definition. This metric might look something like a discrepency between average yelp user rating, and the amount of people who have reviewed it, after we adjust for both neighborhood traffic and restaurant capacity.


Thanks for all your comments. I have summarized them in a new post here with some further thoughts.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


Link to Principal Analytics Prep

See our curriculum, instructors. Apply.
Business analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Founder of Principal Analytics Prep, MS Applied Analytics at Columbia. See my full bio.

Next Events

Apr: 3 How 3 Women Became Data Scientists (Panel), Principal Analytics Prep, NYC

Apr: 25 Analytics Careers Advice, Stevens Institute of Tech, Hoboken, NJ

Apr: 26 Data Visualization Guest Lecture, NYU, New York, NY

May: 2 New York Marketing Association Big Data Workshop, NYC

May: 5 NYPL Analytics Careers Talk, NYC

May: 8 Data Visualization Seminar, Denver, CO

Past Events

See here

Future Courses (New York)

Summer: Statistical Reasoning & Numbersense, Principal Analytics Prep (4 weeks)

Summer: Applied Analytics Frameworks & Methods, Columbia (6 weeks)

Junk Charts Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee


  • only in Big Data