« Not taking numbers at face value, even if they come from Google | Main | Prestigious college desperately plays down shameful manipulation of statistics »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


I think John S is on the right track.

Think of a "critically acclaimed" movie: a highly visible set of reviewers say it's great, but the vast majority think it's overrated. Or think of the restaurant that's just starting out in a nondescript strip mall: those who bother to stop in love it, but the vast majority of people simply have a bad impression when they drive by based on the wrong things (location) rather than what a restaurant would generally be rated on (food, service, atmosphere).

So you could look for restaurants that have a fanatical following, but flags of poor location, etc, that would cause many people to unfairly downrate it. Or look for restaurants which are highly rated by highly visible/influential people who are not representative of the general customer base.

If you're talking under/over-rated to a particular subgroup and you're a member of that subgroup speaking to that subgroup -- say a blogger -- you'd simply find places that were highly rated by your subgroup, but not by the general population. The consensus of being underrated is not a general consensus, but would be with "everybody" you know. Like the Yogism, "No one goes there anymore, it's too crowded."

Jonathan Baron

Perhaps Prelec's "Bayesian truth serum" would be useful here. It gives greater weight to opinions that are "surprisingly common" given the predictions of others' opinions. I'm sure it would show something, but I'm not sure that this would correspond to being "underrated".

Nick F.

If we define underrated as "not rated (often) enough" as opposed to "not rated highly enough." I think we get at a truer statistical definition. This metric might look something like a discrepency between average yelp user rating, and the amount of people who have reviewed it, after we adjust for both neighborhood traffic and restaurant capacity.


Thanks for all your comments. I have summarized them in a new post here with some further thoughts.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Marketing and advertising analytics expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.

Next Events

Mar: 26 Agilone Webinar "How to Build Data Driven Marketing Teams"

Apr: 4 Analytically Speaking Webcast, by JMP, with Alberto Cairo

May: 19-21 Midwest Biopharmaceutical Statistics Workshop, Muncie, IN

May: 25-28 Statistical Society of Canada Conference, Toronto

June: 16-19 Predictive Analytics World (Keynote), Chicago

Past Events

Feb: 27 Data-Driven Marketing Summit by Agilone, San Francisco

Dec: 12 Brand Innovators Big Data Event

Nov: 20 NC State Invited Big Data Seminar

Nov 5: Social Media Today Webinar

Nov: 1 LISA Conference

Oct: 29 NYU Coles Science Center

Oct: 9 Princeton Tech Meetup

Oct: 8 NYU Bookstore, NYC


Jul: 30 BIG Frontier, Chicago

May: 30 Book Expo, NYC

Apr: 4 New York Public Library Labs and Leaders in Software and Art Data Viz Panel, NYC

Mar: 22 INFORMS NY Student-Practitioner Forum on Analytics, NYC

Oct: 19 Predictive Analytics World, NYC

Jul: 30 JSM, Miami

Junk Charts Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee


  • only in Big Data