« Misdiagnosing Groupon's problem | Main | Neat reads 9 »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Ugh. I hated the whole article when I read it. Okay, okay I understand when applying for jobs I'm going to be Googled, thats fine, I expect that. Working in the social media, online community industry I monitor what I post to my own personal accounts a bit more than the average person, but Social Intelligence I think has crossed a line.

The article even says they are referencing things like groups on FB, followed by this statement a few more lines down: "Things that you can’t ask in an interview are the same things you can’t research" But isn't that exactly what they are doing? They are passing judgment on something they very well could have read wrong.

They also mention a user who has several photos with firearms, since when did we loose the right to bear arms?! This users hobbies could be something as simple as being an avid deer hunter, and yet he's being thrown into the non-hire pile because Social Intelligence is diggin where they shouldn't.


You can always fake your own death on Facebook, which should confuse anyone looking for you. Then create a completely new persona. Maybe there is a business opportunity.

E Bogue

The web site indicates that the employer has to 'set up' the check by entering data from the resume. Nothing indicates that Social Intelligence will not sell that information - which may include things a person has never put online - so that it becomes "publicly available" through no fault of one's own.


Self-googling myself shows that there are already sites that aggregate information. (As a scientist with a whose name is on a few articles, I have a bit of a trail.) I don't know about the site described in the NYT article, but the sites I have seen have incomplete information (a PubMed search would be more revealing) and some of them have information on others with the same name. According to the latter, I run marathons and have won an Emmy!


As a practising lawyer, please allow me to say that you are absolutely correct in your last statement. What's puzzling is why everyone else doesn't give up what they're doing and just become a member of the set denoted, 'true winners'? [irony off]

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Marketing and advertising analytics expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Columbia. See my full bio.

Spring 2015 Courses (New York)

Jan 26: Business Analytics & Data Visualization (14 weeks) Info

Feb 23: Statistics for Management (10 weeks) Info

Mar 28: Careers in Business Analytics & Data Science (one-day seminar) Register

Apr 7: The Art of Data Visualization Workshop (6 weeks) Register

Next Events

Sep: 28 Data Visualization New York Meetup, New York, NY

Oct: 5 Andrew Gelman’s Statistical Communications class, Columbia University

Oct: 13 AQR ProSeminar, NYU Sociology

Oct: 22 Leading Business Change Through Analytics, Columbia Business School

Oct: 30 Ray Vella’s Designing Infographics class, NYU

Past Events

See here

Junk Charts Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee


  • only in Big Data