« Want a signed book? | Main | The Economist implicates historians for bad statistics »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Tom

I strongly agree, and have long argued with friends, that network effects have a much stronger influence on the outcome of football games than the traditionally-measured factors of shots. It will be interesting to see how this research pans out.

SB

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/15/magazine/15Battier-t.html
Excellent article on the use of statistics in basketball.

JM Picks

Even the ESPN announcers are realizing that the statistics being printed on the screen have little to do with what is transpiring in the World Cup matches. In a recent match, I noted that ESPN showed or spoke about these statistics: number of shots, number of shots on target, possession time (as proportion of playing time), total number of touches (or passes), number of corners, number of miles run.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Marketing and advertising analytics expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.

Next Events

Aug: 20 DataViz New York Meetup

Aug: 26 Optimizely Experience, Invited Expert, New York

Past Events

See here

Junk Charts Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

Search3

  • only in Big Data

Community