« Update: reviews, etc. | Main | Learning from climate data »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Roger

Just an fyi, but the "mistake" is not a mistake at all. 17 is 8.5 times 2. You used 178 pages of 8.5, so 178 x .11 = 19.58, or 89 x .22 = 19.58.

Also, I think it's interesting that the lone blogger got the law right, yet the 4 more mainstream journalistic outlets got it wrong. Not that I'm surprised though....

derek

So now we know. Asking a statistician what the Law of Large Numbers is, is like asking a physicist what the Law of Physics is. The physicist is likely to ask back "which one did you have in mind?".

But do statisticians say "ye canna change the laws of large numbers!"? :-)

Kaiser

Roger: of course, the selection of quotes is not at all random. I only reviewed recent usage, and I had to stick to quotes that are relatively self-contained.

Derek: We need to organize "take back the law of large numbers."

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Marketing and advertising analytics expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.

Next Events

Aug: 20 DataViz New York Meetup

Aug: 26 Optimizely Experience, Invited Expert, New York

Past Events

See here

Junk Charts Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

Search3

  • only in Big Data

Community