I like the Guardian's feature (undated) on gun violence in American cities a lot.
The following graphic illustrates the situation in Baltimore.
The designer starts by placing where the gun homicides occured in 2015. Then, it leads readers through an exploration of the key factors that might be associated with the spatial distribution of those homicides.
The blue color measures poverty levels. There is a moderate correlation between high numbers of dots (homicides) and deeper blue (poorer). The magenta color measures education attainment and the orange color measures proportion of blacks. In Baltimore, it appears that race is substantially better at explaining the prevalence of homicides.
This work is exemplary because it transcends description (first map) and explores explanations for the spatial pattern. Because three factors are explored together in a small-multiples layout, readers learn that no single factor can explain everything. In addition, we learn that different factors have different degrees of explanatory power.
Attentive readers will also find that the three factors of poverty, education attainment and proportion black are mutually correlated. Areas with large black populations also tend to be poorer and less educated.
The top section is less successful as proportions are not easily conveyed via dot density maps.
Dropping the map form helps. Here is a draft of what I have in mind. I just pulled some data from online sources at the metropolitan area (MSA) level, and it doesn't have as striking a comparison as the city-level data, it seems.
PS. On Twitter, Aliza tells me the article was dated January 9, 2017.