« Bewildering baseball math | Main | Is it worth the drama? »

Comments

derek

Why not count predictions as a percentage, excluding abstentions?

(I hope inline images are supported; preview seems to think so)
The interesting thing is that 2015 is not declining in popularity, despite the fact we're running out of 2015.

derek

To be clear, the Wall Street Journal line should read "Fed meeting participants have stopped pushing back the date at which they believe rates will rise".

David

There is actually little of interest in the data.

Exactly. I'm not one of those people who thinks that a reader should be able to decipher a data visualization in a few seconds. But if a data visualization does take more than a few seconds to understand, the payoff better be pretty great.

There's no such payoff here for a reader tenacious enough to try to figure this out.

Kaiser

Derek: I didn't look up whether "empty seats" are abstentions or literally empty seats. One situation in which I'd not count abstentions is if the by-laws say that you only need X% of those present to make a decision, no matter how low the attendance is.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Columbia. See my full bio.

Book Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read



Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter

Residues