« A deeper look at the Bloomberg report | Main | Update on Dataviz Workshop 1 »

Comments

Tom West

The correct thing to do here is plot Dow 1928/29 on the x-axis, and Dow 2012/14 on the y-axis. That would reveal any correlation much better.

Shawn Shafer

And here I thought the correlation showed that the market grows over time.

Hig

Seems like your replot of the data is good, and you could simplify by giving it truly a single y-axis... say proportional change relative to Jan 1 or something like that. It would look identical to yours, but emphasize that the volatility observed in '28 & '29 isn't being seen today.

I get what you're saying about dual axes on the first viral chart. However I think the more dramatic sin is one of extreme cherry-picking. If you're looking for a time-period to compare '28 & '29 to, you could pick any period, say the 2 years after July 2nd 1983. Given enough patience or an algorithm that looked for meaningless correlation, you could probably do even better than this particular comparison.

Kaiser

Hig: The second version is not my work but that of the Atlantic blogger. Just thought I should clarify that.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.

Book Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read



Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter

Residues