« Book review: Data Points by Nathan Yau | Main | How to get started in analytics »



It would seem to link current GDP per capita to GDP growth with points connected by time, and some kind of smoothing to iron out most recessions and so forth. Presumably the data for China's ancient pass has simply been omitted if it is known at all. I don't understand the call-out box though, all I can think is that 10-year annualised growth rates are calculated compared to GDP at the starting year so the end of the Chinese line corresponds to its GDP per capita in 2000.


Here's my guess: It should have been a scatter plot and the lines are some sort of weird smoother. The x-axis is the per capita GDP in a given year (i) and the y-axis is the percentage growth rate corresponding with that year (i:i+1). So maybe the message that is trying to be communicated is that as economies grow, the percent growth rate decreases? I haven't looked up any numbers at all to see if the line ends correspond with that country's maximum per capita GDP...


Also, Germany and Japan are the only countries with negative growth - perhaps reflecting World Wars? After the negative growth rate, the next year is to the left on the x-axis so I'm guessing that the lines are connecting the points in order.


I think it is pretty cool. It shows 10 years of data points connected sequentially. X axes is the per-capita gdp and y axes is growth.

I like the feeling of countries trying to catch up the US but still falling behind. Also, you see that high growth only comes with low gdp-per capita.


This is a good idea, plotting in a phase space. Only since GDP growth is the logarithmic derivative of GDP, this cries for a log plot on the x axis. Obviously, this would also help de-confuse the squiggles on the left side.


Makes sense to me %Growth vs Per Capita GDP. Time is Static.


Jorge: could it really be 10 years? You believe the per-capita GDP of US in 2003 was $2,500? According to the World Bank, US per capita GDP in 1980 in current US$ was just over $12,000. There is just something off about this chart.

The lesson here is don't fall off the float while you're decorating it.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


Link to Principal Analytics Prep

See our curriculum, instructors. Apply.
Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Columbia. See my full bio.

Book Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read

Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter