« Fundraiser glass half empty or half full | Main | Climate change and duelling charts »



You don't even mention the problems with the categories themselves.

Anyone aged 65 years of age would not have a place in this chart. Too old for the 60-64, and too young for the "over 65"


bob: thanks for mentioning it. I wrote, then deleted the sentence about age categories. The other crazy category is 13-14 when all other non-edge groups are 5-year groups. This issue originates from the CDC data though.


avert.org appears now to have seen the error of their ways, and (presumably) spent some of their donors' money on creating bar charts instead. "Do it nice, or do it twice".

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Columbia. See my full bio.

Book Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read

Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter