« Light entertainment: impossible is nothing! | Main | When simple is too simple »



Even given that the sizing of the 2016 pie isn't proportionate, how could it be when the total amount is given as a range? That should make it impossible to show the proportion right, regardless. Color also plays a big role here - the emerging markets, the ones that are growing, are BRIGHT RED!, while the ones we're apparently supposed to ignore are more subdued colors.

Meic Goodyear

The radius if the 2016 pie is about double that of the 2006 pie. It's the area that's not, as it goes by the radius squared.


"The radius of the 2016 pie is at least three times larger than that of the 2006 pie"? You sure? By my measurement, it's slightly less that 2 times, which is correct, if you forget to assign totals to area instead of length.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


Link to Principal Analytics Prep

See our curriculum, instructors. Apply.
Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Columbia. See my full bio.

Book Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read

Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter