« Santa is uber god, so says Venn | Main | How to mess up a bar chart »



Isn't it easier to read, and just as informative, to simply put Paul between the others on the stacked chart? http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21362/two-or-three-party.jpg

Jon Peltier

I like the horizontal bar chart with labels on the bars. But I think it would be better keeping the bars grouped. Without the numeric labels, it's hard to tell that Obama's 51% beats Gingrich's 43%.

I like your use of a flow chart to track where Paul's votes come from.


It would be nice to see how an Obama vs Paul election would go too. That's probably a valuable piece of information.

John Roth

To me the truly interesting piece of information is that both results with Paul as a spoiler are almost exactly the same: two of them are identical and two differ by one point.

None of the versions make this obvious, although the flow chart at least makes it reasonably easy to find.

Tom Hopper

I am not a fan of the flow chart, as used here. The story of this graph is told almost entirely with numbers; take them away and the reader would learn nothing, except that some colored boxes point to others; the graphical elements serve only as highlighting for the numbers.

I think that a web plot, or bipartite graph, in which the width of ribbons connecting each side of the graph represent the number of votes transferring from candidate A to candidate B, would do a better job telling the story. Such graphs can be created in R with the "bipartite" package, and an example graph (much busier than your example) can be found here: http://www.oga-lab.net/RGM_results/bipartite/bipartite-package/bipartite-package_001_big.png

Another alternative might be to combine a cladogram-style decision tree with your bar graph of vote percentages. Something a bit like: http://www.scielo.br/img/revistas/babt/v52n6/a14fig02.gif. This might be the best option, as it would tell both stories in a single visual, and encourage thinking about the election results in detail.

Account Deleted

Adjusting the width of the arrows in the flow to show the relative sizes of the flows would make the chart clearer, and even better would be to adjust the sizes of the boxes too. (This would in effect give a bipartite graph as suggested by Tom Hopper.)


Do horizontal bar charts violate self-sufficiency principle? IMO, it seems so. Indeed, I would not be so sad. I've never been sure that self-sufficiency should be always a virtue, and this case would be an example.

how to convert flv to mp4

Obama-Romney thing is really weird for me.
Hard to tell what i felt when Romney won here in Florida.
But i still think Obama is going to be re-elected.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.

Book Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read

Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter