« Yellow fever rolling over America | Main | Too much art, not enough science in infographics »

Comments

Rick Wicklin

The lack of standardization seems the biggest problem. I would have preferred to see the data as a "percentage of all users of social media," which would have enabled comparison across different sites (as you point out).

Like you, I wonder why the various sites are displayed horizontally in 3 graphics, but vertically in the Site vs. Age graphic? I critiqued a similar chart of social media usage by age last year: http://blogs.sas.com/iml/index.php?/archives/55-How-Does-Participation-in-Social-Media-Vary-with-Age.html

Jörgen Abrahamsson

There should have been ordering to show the patterns in the data. That is the main problem.

The tetris look is a bad solution but there is a case for using
actual visualization of the data(60%,40%) instead of just the proportionality of those numbers(6:4 or rather 3:2).That is what a standard (stacked or not)bar chart does. When practical I think it is better to show the actual numbers.

I´m not sure you can say that relative numbers are the wrong choice. Relative vs absolute numbers are allways an issue. I find the relative question as interesting.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.

Book Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read



Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter

Residues