« Making charts beautiful without adding unneeded bits | Main | Rightsizing: the graph edition »

Comments

Parker S.

Thanks for taking this on, Kaiser. You at least made it easier to analyze. It's still a lot of teams. I think one more revision to this might be to split this out into the three groups you mentioned - top quartile, bottom quartile and middle. I'd do it based on the ending or current date though.

The storylines become:
- Top 25% This is how the top teams got here (they've always been good, they were darkhorses [Tampa Bay] or they are rags to riches [Oakland])
- Bottom 25% Here's the bottom of the barrel (too bad for Detroit and Buffalo, Carolina is getting even more awful, and Dallas has fallen on hard times . . . so far)
- Mid 50% Steady-Eddies (these teams just don't have what it takes to make the next step up but they aren't dreadful either)

Anyway - great work. It's a little messy, but you did a great job with it.

Oh yea . . . Go Falcons!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.

Book Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read



Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter

Residues