« Unscientific American 2: a review of key concepts | Main | Audio bookmarks »



There are two issues on the better graph you realized and that could improve the whole thing.

1. Showing that it is from 2007 to 2010. The labeling gives only 2007 and creates confusion when seen alone without the context of the text.

2. Adding the word "World". The market share and profit share are intended to be worldwide. It is important, because many many articles are often given number when it is only USA market shares, and people copy them thinking it is worldwide.

Horace Dediu

Thanks for the analysis. My first attempt was using the second chart you show, but I did not like it because of the clutter and noisy look. I agree about the harmonizing of the scale. I should have done it and was thinking of it after it was published. Someone at gizmodo took it and added color to the vectors. It was an improvement as you could see each vendor as a different color.

(by the way, the numbers were all for cellular phones)

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


Link to Principal Analytics Prep

See our curriculum, instructors. Apply.
Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Columbia. See my full bio.

Book Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read

Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter