« This is meant as an art piece | Main | Yellow, green and polka dots »


Patrick McCann

comparative lengths of ranks are not meaningful, so distorting them by making bar lengths rank n+2 does not take anything away. In fact, it likely restores the comparative lengths to closer to their nominal values. For example, if rank 1 had a nominal value of 100 and rank 2 had a nominal value of 120, the ratio of (1+2)/(2+2) is closer to 100/120 than 1/2 is to 100/120. I would imagine this might typically hold true for most of the distributions of nominal values within the categories in the chart.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


Link to Principal Analytics Prep

See our curriculum, instructors. Apply.
Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Columbia. See my full bio.

Book Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read

Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter