Chris P sent this one along. Rarely has a simple linear equation been rendered so hard to understand. Have some fun while scouting the cougars! The write up is here.
« 8 Red Flags about the "Useful chartjunk" paper | Main | Popularity contests and charts »
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.
Recent Posts
- An overused chart, why it fails, and how to fix it
- Conventions, novelty and the double edge
- Law of small numbers, in action
- Advocacy graphics
- Me and Alberto Cairo in one room tomorrow
- A promising infographic about motorcycle helmets
- Dissecting charts from a Big Data study
- Update on Dataviz Workshop 3
- Some chart types are not scalable
- The closer you look, the more confused
Recent Comments
- Cris on An overused chart, why it fails, and how to fix it
- Andy Chandarana on An overused chart, why it fails, and how to fix it
- Motorradbekleidung on A promising infographic about motorcycle helmets
- Motorradhelme shop on A promising infographic about motorcycle helmets
- Steve Cramer on Conventions, novelty and the double edge
- conchis on Conventions, novelty and the double edge
- jmkeuning on Advocacy graphics
- Ken on Conventions, novelty and the double edge
- derek on Conventions, novelty and the double edge
- LemmusLemmus on Conventions, novelty and the double edge
The Read
Good Books
Keep in Touch
follow me on TwitterSearch
Categories
- Advertising
- Aggregation
- Animation
- Area chart
- Art
- Axis
- Background
- Bar chart
- Book
- Book blog
- Books
- Boxplot
- Bubble chart
- Bumps chart
- Business
- Business Week
- Cambridge
- Clustering
- CNN
- Color
- Comparability
- Compound plots
- Craft
- Crime
- Current Affairs
- Data
- Data labels
- Design
- Donut chart
- Dot plot
- Economics
- Economist
- Education
- Environment
- Event
- Film
- Finance
- Flow chart
- Food and Drink
- Gridlines
- Heatmap
- Infographics
- Interactive
- Legend
- Light entertainment
- Line chart
- Map
- Medicine
- Music
- NYT
- NYU
- Open call
- Outlier
- Personal
- Pie chart
- Politics
- Press
- Profile chart
- Randomness
- Recognition
- Religion
- Scale
- Scatter plot
- Science
- Selection
- Simplicity
- Small multiples
- Software
- Sorting
- Specialty plots
- Sports
- Statistics
- Sufficiency
- Superimposed
- Table
- Tech Review
- Television
- Text
- Time series
- Tools
- Travel
- Trifecta checkup
- Variance
- Web/Tech
- Weblogs
- Wikipedia
- Wired
- WSJ
Common Interests
About
Residues
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License
So a 50 year old can date a 30 year old, but a 30 year old can't date a 50 year old. Or maybe the 50 year old will be considered socially acceptable but the 30 year old wont. It's all a bit complex.
Posted by: Ken | May 20, 2010 at 06:38 AM
Ken -
Half your age plus 7 is the lower limit. Twice your age minus 14 must be the upper limit.
A 50-year-old can date as young as 32 years old. A 30-year-old can date as old as 46 years old.
Posted by: Jon Peltier | May 20, 2010 at 07:42 AM
Ahh, the terrible burden of being 14 years old: one's choices there are quite constrained. But then, who else would want to go near one?
Posted by: Mike | May 20, 2010 at 04:52 PM
But you have to account for the fact that there are fewer singles available as you get older:
http://opposedsystemsdesign.blogsome.com/2010/05/20/procrastination/
Posted by: Wiggins | May 20, 2010 at 11:19 PM
Is this concept ok for a line chart in general?
I have a set of data which has a relatively predictable low, high, average. Could I use a line chart for something like that?
Posted by: dan l | May 21, 2010 at 09:13 AM