« Space and time | Main | Degrees of likeness 1 »


Stephen Hampshire

I good example of why relative risks are a terrible way to communicate. I suspect they get used because they tend to make exciting headlines.

Gerd Gigerenzer has a great article on the BMJ website on communicating risk: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/327/7417/741

Radford Neal

Of course, the "deadly as taking arsenic" comment is just as ridiculous. Depending on how much arsenic you take, the risk of death from taking arsenic varies continuously from 0 to 100%, so one can add this comment to any article about something that that has any risk at all.

I notice that the article also doesn't consider the possibility that the increased vitamin D production might outweight the risk of cancer. Of course, there's a long history of people who ought to know better warning about the risk of sun exposure without mention vitamin D, which verges on being criminally irresponsible.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


Link to Principal Analytics Prep

See our curriculum, instructors. Apply.
Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Columbia. See my full bio.

Book Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read

Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter