« Vanishing act | Main | Break it down, build it up »



That's hilarious. I saw that chart a couple of days ago, and the first thing I thought was that this would be a good target for junk charts.

The sad thing is that somebody actually spend a lot of time obscuring what they are trying to convey.


Did these programmers deliver 100% of the world's projects between them, I wonder?

Jorge Camoes

From the first comment: "The graphs are well done. How did you make them?"

First rule of good information visualization: if the user asks something like this the chart is not invisible. If the chart is not invisible there is something wrong with it.

Jon Peltier

Because of the forest image, the legend bears no resemblance to the pie wedges. I was also distracted by the increasing offset of the wedgtes from the pie center: I actually spent more time examining the center of the chart than the data.

I'm not really sure, but I think Other is the largest category, and they are plotted largest to smallest. So while it looked weird enough for you to mention, I think this one aspect of the chart was not done improperly.

Chris P

I don't see bark and leaves on the legend.

The second comment on the site points to the tool that was used to make this plumb. Another great example from Graph ZX is here:


Tony Rose

Oh my.

Just when you think they can't get any worse, something like this pops up.

This brings me back to the idea that people need to "pretty-up" their charts. Maybe they're trying to get a "WOW" response. I don't know... Stick to the basics is my advice when seeing something like this.

Jan Schultink

Oops. A great start for a "before-after" makeover.


Great info.
Reminds me of an article I ran into that talks about Visualization making its way into Enterprise Software
Visualization Video


I just found this blog, it's great.

I thought one of the worst things with this chart is that it is trying to show what projects famous programmers have worked on, but the biggest slice of the pie is the most useless piece of data: Other. The categories are obviously inadequate if the miscellaneous category dominated the presentation...


Thanks Brian. Your point about "Other" is right on.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


Link to Principal Analytics Prep

See our curriculum, instructors. Apply.
Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Columbia. See my full bio.

Book Blog

Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read

Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter