« Loss aversion | Main | Bubbles of the same size »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341e992c53ef010534b817f3970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Reading:

Comments

Ken

The problem that Wall Street didn't consider was that their investments were changing the whole economy. Debt was rising massively, until of course the first default happened. Then the money flows reduced and there wasn't the same available to pay debt.

They simply maximised for the local system and then found out that the global mattered.

nate

If you're interested in the better statistic:

"One recent study found that a person who inherits the mutation has a 28% chance of developing Parkinson’s by the age of 59, 51% by the age of 69 and 74% by the age of 79."

http://spittoon.23andme.com/2008/09/18/google-co-founder-blogs-about-23andme-data-parkinsons-risk/

Jon Peltier

Re the Freakonomics charts. Don't look at them as bar charts, look at them as step charts. Not as good as a smooth continuous curve, but it shows the distribution in other ways without giving equal weight (equal bar thickness) to grossly unequal sample/bin sizes.

Ali

"I don't see why the first, and simplest, chart has a problem."

It doesn't really, as far as the data it's trying to show. The problem is trying to convey the extra information about how many people are affected in each tax bracket. The reason is how many people actually get this wrong. Charlie Gibson famously failed to appreciate this in *two* elections -- debates in 2004 (Kerry v Bush) and 2008 (Obama v Clinton). Somehow, the Democratic talking point of top 1% or whatever never makes it through (according to poll, I think). Personally, I think most voters aren't really thinking about taxes as much as other issues. Democrats worry otherwise. I think this is why the second chart is getting a fair bit of play in the liberal blogosphere.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.

Book Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read



Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter

Residues