« Lining things up | Main | Loss aversion »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341e992c53ef010534963535970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference As simple as possible but no simpler:

Comments

austin

nice!
Only issue I have is with the term 'poor' voters; I thought it was people who tended not to get out and vote!

SilentD

States are much too large to consider as monolithic entities. When you look at county-level data, you find tremendous social and political diversity within states.

jfranchino

another conclusion I thought of, and correct me if I'm wrong about this:
In Republican states, economic issues are a wedge between the rich and poor, while social issues are unifying.

John S.

To anyone who has not read Gelman's book, I highly recommend it. Contrary to SilentD's comment above, state-level election data has many interesting stories to tell, and Gelman makes effective use of graphics to tell them.

Jock Mackinlay

Simple is good but it depends on the data story that is being told. In my blog, I show that adding more to this view tells Gelmen's story more effectively.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Marketing analytics and data visualization expert. Author and Speaker. Currently at Vimeo and NYU. See my full bio.

Book Blog



Link to junkcharts

Graphics design by Amanda Lee

The Read



Good Books

Keep in Touch

follow me on Twitter

Residues